Which is the systematic way of determining the value and worth of a person in relation to other person in an Organisation?

Job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value / worth a job in relation to other jobs in an organization. It tries to make systematic comparison between jobs to assess their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure.
Job evaluation needs to be differentiated from job analysis. Job analysis is a systematic way of gathering information about a job. Every job evaluation method requires at least some basic job analysis in order to provide factual information about the jobs concerned. Thus, job evaluation begins with job analysis and ends at that point where the worth of a job is ascertained for achieving pay equity between jobs.
Job evaluation versus performance appraisal (PA):
Job evaluation is different from performance appraisal. PA is the systematic description of an employee’s job related strengths and weaknesses. The basic purpose of PA is to find out how well the employee is doing the job and establish a plan for improvement. The aim of job evaluation is to find the relative value / worth of a job to determine what a fair wage or such a job should be. The difference between the two may be presented thus:
Job evaluation versus Performance
Point >> Define >> Aim >> Shows
Job evaluation
1) Find the relative worth of a job.
2) Determine wage rates for different jobs.
3) How much a job is worth?
Performance appraisal
1) Find the worth of a job holder.
2) Determine incentives and rewards for superior performance
3) How well an individual is doing an assigned work?
Features:
The purpose of job evaluation is to produce a defensive ranking of jobs on which a rational and acceptable pay structure can be built. The important features of job evaluation may be summarized thus:
1) It tries to assess jobs, not people
2) The standards of jobs evaluation are relative not absolute
3) The basic information on which job evaluations are made as obtained from job analysis.
4) Job evaluation are carried out by groups not by individuals
5) Some degree of subjectivity is always present in job evaluation
6) Job evaluation does not fix pay scales but merely provides a basis for evaluating a rational wage structure.
Process of Job evaluation
The process of job evaluation involves the following steps:
Gaining acceptance:
Before undertaking job evaluation, top management must explain the aims and uses of the program to the employees and unions. To elaborate the program further oral presentations could be made. Letters booklets could not be used to classify all relevant aspects of the job evaluation programs.
Creating job evaluation committee:
It is not possible for a single person to evaluate all the key jobs in an organization. Usually a job evaluation committee consisting of experienced employees union representatives and HR experts is created to set the ball rolling.
Finding the jobs to be evaluated:
Every job need not be evaluated. This may be too taxing and costly. Certain keys jobs in each department may be identified. While picking up the jobs, care must be taken to ensure that they represent the type of work performed in that department.
Analysing and preparing job description:

This requires the preparation of job descriptions and also an analysis of jobs need for successful performance.
Selecting the method of evaluation:
The most important method of evaluating the jobs must be identified now, keeping the job factors as well as organizational demands in mind.
Classifying Jobs:
The relative worth of various jobs in an organization may be found out after arranging jobs in order of importance using criteria such as skill requirements, experience needed, under which conditions job is performed type of responsibilities to be shouldered, degree of supervision needed the amount of stress caused by the job etc. Weights can be assigned to each such factor. When we finally add all the weights the worth of a job is determined. The points may then be converted into monetary values.
Source: HRM

A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the relative value/worthof a job in relation to other jobs in an organization with the purpose ofestablishing a rational pay structure.Classifying jobs:— The relative worth of various jobs in an organization may be foundout after arranging jobs in order of importance using criteria such asskill requirements, experience needed, under which conditions job isperformed, type of responsibilities to be shouldered, degree ofsupervision needed, the amount of stress caused by the job, etc.Job Evaluation MethodsJob evaluation methods may be grouped according to the extentto which they use quantitative approaches.

Job Evaluation MethodsRanking:Jobs are compared to each other based on the overall worth of thejob to the organization. The 'worth' of a job is usually based on judgementsof skill, effort (physical and mental), responsibility (supervisory and fiscal),and working conditions.AdvantagesDisadvantagesSimpleJudgements tend to be subjective.Very effective whenthere are relativelyfew jobs to beevaluated (less than30).Difficult to administer with large number of jobs.Since there is no standard used for comparison,new jobs have to be compared with the existingjobs to determine its appropriate rank. In essence,the ranking process would have to be repeatedeach time a new job is added to the organization.Only provides a relative, not absolute, measure ofa job’s worth.Job Evaluation Methods

The matrix below shows and example of how an organization might rankjobs.Column JobsSeniorAdministrativeSecretaryData-EntryOperatorData-ProcessingDirectorFileClerkSystemsAnalystProgrammerTotalRow JobsSeniorAdministrativeSecretaryXXX3Data-EntryOperatorX1Data-ProcessingDirectorXXXXX5File Clerk0SystemsAnalystXXXX4ProgrammerXX2An X is placed in the cell where the value of a row job is higher than that of acolumn job.Job Evaluation MethodsGrading/Classification:Jobs are classified into an existing grade/categorystructure or hierarchy. Each level in the structure has a description andassociated job titles. Each job is assigned to the grade/category whichprovides the closest match. The classification of a position is decided bycomparing the whole job with the appropriate job grading standard.

The standards do not attempt to describe all aspects of each job, but insteadseek to describe key characteristics which are significant for distinguishingdifferent levels.AdvantagesDisadvantagesSimpleClassification judgments aresubjective.The grade/category structureexists independent of the jobs.Therefore, new jobs can beclassified more easily than theRanking Method.

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 77 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Is the set of systematic procedures to determine the relative worth of jobs within the organization?

Job evaluation is the systematic process of determining the relative value of different jobs in an organization. The goal of job evaluation is to compare jobs with each other in order to create a pay structure that is fair, equitable, and consistent for everyone.

Is a systematic and orderly process of measuring the worth of a job in relation to other jobs?

"Job evaluation is a systematic and orderly process of determining the worth of a job in relation to other jobs."

What are the 4 methods of job evaluation?

Four primary methods of job evaluations used to set compensation levels are point factor, factor comparison, job ranking and job classification.

What are the 5 types of job evaluation methods?

5 Actionable Job Evaluation Methods.
Ranking Method..
Classification/Grading Method..
Point-Factor Method..
Factor Comparison Method..
Competitive Market Analysis Method..