What are the conflict resolution techniques in project management?

What are the conflict resolution techniques in project management?

There are 5 conflict resolution techniques. But, before going into them, it is worth understanding what a conflict actually is, and why does it arise..

What is a conflict ?

In simple words it can be defined as an active disagreement between people with opposing interests or opinions.

In any project environment, conflict is inevitable. There could be different reasons for conflict such as

  • Scarce project resources
  • Unclear role definitions
  • Personal working styles of the individuals
  • Cost and schedule priorities
  • Individual ambitions etc

Resolving conflicts efficiently and effectively is one of the main duties of a Project manager and the success of the project often depends on the project manager’s ability to resolve conflicts.

Now, there are many ways to resolve conflicts. However, PMBOK mentions 5 techniques as general techniques for resolving a conflict.

5 Conflict Resolution Techniques

  1. Collaborate/Problem Solve/Confronting
  2. Compromise/Reconcile
  3. Withdrawal/Avoid
  4. Smooth/Accommodate
  5. Force/Direct

Let us look at one by one in detail..

Collaborate/Problem Solve/Confront 

  • “collaborate” in general means, taking into consideration different items. In line with this, The Collaborate technique is Collaborating multiple viewpoints (perspectives).
  • In this technique, the Project manager facilitates open discussion among the conflicting parties. 
  • It requires cooperative attitude and open dialogue between conflicting parties.
  • This technique typically leads to consensus and commitment.
  • This approach often leads to a WIN-WIN situation.

Compromise/Reconcile

  • This technique is looking for a solution that is acceptable to all conflicting parties and brings some degree of satisfaction to all the parties. 
  • This technique only temporarily or partially resolves the conflict. 
  • This approach leads to LOOSE-LOOSE situation, as no party gets everything.

Withdrawl/Avoid

  • As the name “Avoid” suggests, this technique is about avoiding a conflict situation.
  • It is retreating from an actual or potential conflict situation.
  • This is postponing the conflict, to get more time, to be more prepared, or wait out till the conflict dies out or be resolved by others.

Smooth/Accommodate

  • Name “Accommodate” suggests that, you are accommodating or accepting the views of the other party.
  • It is conceding one’s position to the needs of others to maintain harmony in relationships.
  • It is emphasizing the areas of agreement rather than the areas of difference. 

Force/Direct

  • It is forcing one view point at the expense of others. 
  • This technique can be used or enforced from a position of power, often to resolve emergencies.
  • This approach often results in WIN-LOOSE situation.

These 5 techniques are not used arbitrarily for any conflict situation. Each technique has its place and use. There are different factors that influence the conflict resolution techniques type that should be employed, such as

  • Importance of the conflict
  • Intensity of the conflict
  • Time and costs involved
  • Power of the people involved in the conflict
  • Need and motivation to resolve the conflict on a long term or short term basis
  • Importance of maintaining good relations
  • etc.

We are sitting in a cafe near the office. Corwin is silent all the time since I dragged him for a break. His coffee is getting cold, but he never touched it.

“OK, buddy, what’s on your mind? You are so far away from here.” I tried to break the ice.

Corwin sipped coffee at last and started to get back to the cafe from his heavy thoughts. He signed and shrugged a bit like giving up. “This conflict is killing me. It’s dragging for four weeks. And it seems like it is just getting started.”

Corwin managed his team for more than a year already. There were no problems at all. He finished many small projects successfully.

Several months ago the project contract was extended. His team grew up quite large. And he got under the radar of technical officers.

We drank coffee and ate complimentary cookies for a minute in silence. I felt that Corwin is willing and ready to share his worries. But I did not want to push.

“My team leader clashed with that technical officer. Peter is his name. You worked with him I believe.” Corwin sat back in his chair.

“Yes, I remember the guy. He is harsh a bit.”

“They are fighting on some technical aspect of a project. It looks so subtle to me.” Corwin rubbed his tired eyes. “Yet they both describe it as a disaster of an industrial magnitude. And now it’s getting really personal.”

“Yeah, unresolved conflicts become personal. Though they rarely start like that.”

He smiled with a face that meant I nailed the point.

Conflict Resolution Techniques

“So, what would you do in my place?”

“Let’s review your options here.” I took a notebook and put numbers from five to one. From the worst to the best conflict resolution techniques.

5. Forcing One Side at the Expense of the Another

“What is the worst approach that you can take right now?” I asked and prepared to note down Corwin’s answer.

Without thinking, he said, “For sure, I can force my team leader to follow Peter’s requirements. There is no way I can force Peter to agree with our point of view. His authority and reputation are at stake already.”

“That is true,” I said writing down option number five. “That will kill your relationships with Kevin. Is that his name? Your team leader I mean.”

“Yes, it’s him. What’s next?”

4. Smoothing the Conflict With Emphasise on Agreements

“We are in the same boat kind of approach,” I suggested smiling. We both knew, it never works with the kind of people we work.

“You know it doesn’t work. Both of them believe they are making the project better. I can see that. But that is not the point. They want to prove that their solution is better.”

“Better for whom?” I asked, getting to the real meat of conflict resolution in project management.

“That’s the problem they are challenging each other. But I doubt it is for the good of the customer.”

“Conflict resolution should serve the interests of a customer”

“So, we both agree then,” Corwin summarised. “It is not an option.”

3. Withdrawal of the Conflicting Parties

“Have you tried to separate them for a bit?”

“Sure,” Corwin smiled sadly. “That’s what I did in the first place after they started yelling. I thought it was a temporary exasperation. So, I forced all communications between them to go through me. I thought I would mediate the conflict this way.”

“It didn’t work?”

“It was a total failure,” another sad smile. ”I tried to avoid the conflict. But it is not something a good project manager does. Right?”

“You are right. It looks like you cool down the hot heads and buy some time to work it out. But in fact, you are postponing the conflict. Is it where it grew personal and emotional?”

Corwin collected milky cappuccino foam from the bottom of his cup. Signed and said, “That was a bad move, wasn’t it? OK, what’s next? By the way, how do you know it’s only five options there?”

2. Compromising with Both Parties

I wrote down point number four and a word “Compromise” as a hint.

Corwin grasped the idea quickly, “So, you are suggesting to find a solution that will satisfy both of them?”

“I’m not suggesting it because I already know the answer.”

“Solutions are mutually exclusive,” my friend noticed. “The only way to please them both is to let them try both approaches. But who would approve that? It also puts us in a bad light in front of the clients.”

“Yes, it questions our expertise,” I switched to the last and the best conflict resolution technique.

1. Collaborating to Find the Best Solution

We both sat staring into the distance thinking how collaboration may look like in this case.

“How about a panel discussion?” I suggested.

“Oh, panel discussion,” Corwin said amused. “You suggest getting other technical experts at the table. Let them all openly discuss pros and cons of both approaches.”

“Yes, moreover, we need someone whom they both respect and see as authority,” I continued. “But these experts should not be biased.”

“Someone from another department, then.”

“Yes.”

“That might work,” Corwin cheered up a bit. “So, either Peter or Kevin may sway under the influence and authority of those experts.”

“And it won’t look like a failure. You can just support a valid point of view of another person. Doesn’t feel like backing away.”

When Conflict Resolution Techniques Doesn’t work

Several days later we had lunch together.

“How did it go?” I asked getting back to the collaboration solution.

“It did not work,” Corwin chirped. “It seemed like we had a great open discussion. I thought Peter even agreed that there are good pros in our solution. They even shook hands. But the next day, it all started again.”

I smiled back, “So, you fixed Peter’s problem. But it is not a root cause of it, isn’t it?”

“Now I can see, that it’s not a “technical” problem at all.” Corwin was happy that a personal part of the conflict was resolved. “My project grew up rapidly. I think it is time to look for the new influential stakeholders. Someone’s trying to take a bit of control of our work.”

“What you are going to do with Peter?”

Corwin thought for a moment, “No matter how good we are, these techniques do not always work. But I still need to get things done and keep up with our commitments to the client. I’ll isolate Peter as much as I can and give some breathing space for the team to finish the work. We wasted too much time and efforts on it already.”

“Sounds like a plan!”

This case did not resolve reasonably well. The conflict lasted for several months after that. Despite all the efforts and approaches Corwin used, nothing worked.

The thing is:

You cannot always please them all. Not all conflicts will work out into a collaborative consensus. Sometimes you have to choose a lesser evil.

Do you believe in working towards mutually beneficial solutions in conflict resolution? Put a "+" if agree with this approach.

***

About the Author

Dmitriy Nizhebetskiy is an active Project Manager who helps junior and mid-level PMs to develop knowledge and skills in project management and leadership.

He provides a lot of learning materials and tips on project management for free at PROJECT MANAGEMENT BASICS.

Leadership and Motivation in Project Management

Get two books for free and learn:

  • Understand your role as a PM correctly
  • Learn what leadership means in project management
  • Find out how to lead when you have not authority yet
  • Prepare yourself to lead other leaders and managers
  • Learn how to develop a strong Project Management Team

Click the link to get the book now!

What are the conflict resolution techniques?

The Top 5 Conflict Resolution Strategies.
Don't Ignore Conflict. ... .
Clarify What the Issue Is. ... .
Bring Involved Parties Together to Talk. ... .
Identify a Solution. ... .
Continue to Monitor and Follow Up on the Conflict..

What are the 5 methods of conflict resolution?

5 conflict resolution strategies.
Accommodating. This method of conflict resolution, also known as smoothing, involves one party acquiescing, giving the opposing party exactly what it needs to resolve the problem. ... .
Avoiding. ... .
Compromising. ... .
Collaborating. ... .
Competing..

What are the 14 effective conflict resolution techniques?

These 14 conflict resolution techniques will get you to the next level..
Use Active Listening. ... .
Take a Genuine Interest. ... .
Ask Open-Ended Questions. ... .
Seek Points of Commonality. ... .
Mirror What Others Say. ... .
Offer a True Apology. ... .
Always Assume the Best. ... .
Clarify Your Next Steps..

Which techniques are resolution techniques?

Separation of different components in a racemic mixtwre is known as resolution. Different methods used for resolutpon are 1) By using enzymes 2) Conversion to diastereomers 3) Chromatographic method using special adsorbents. 4) Mechanical Separation 5) Deracemization.