So sánh quadro m2000 vs k2200 năm 2024
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores640640Core clock speed1046 MHz1038 MHzBoost clock speed1124 MHz1197 MHzNumber of transistors1,870 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)68 Watt55 WattTexture fill rate44.9643.92Floating-point performance1,439 gflops1,405 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on Quadro K2200 and Quadro M2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizeno datalargeInterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)Length202 mmno dataWidth1-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5012 MHz5000 MHzMemory bandwidth80.19 GB/s80 GB/sShared memoryno data- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputsDisplay Portno data1.2 TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Optimusno data+3D Vision Prono data+Mosaicno data+nView Display Managementno data+Optimusno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12Shader Model5.15.0OpenGL4.64.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA5.05.0 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. K2200 outperforms M2000M by 3% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% K2200 outperforms M2000M by 3% in Passmark. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Quadro K2200 11085 +18.4% K2200 outperforms M2000M by 18% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% K2200 outperforms M2000M by 11% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% K2200 outperforms M2000M by 9% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2200 and Quadro M2000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 162 Mh/s 173 Mh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 1.6 Mh/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD35−40 36 4K10−12 11 Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 9.14 8.90 Recency 22 July 2014 2 October 2015 Memory bandwidth 80.19 80 Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 55 Watt We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200 and Quadro M2000M. The differences in performance seem too small. Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro K2200 Quadro M2000M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |