Nếu bạn muốn so sánh hiệu năng của một card đồ họa nào đó với một card đồ họa khác, bạn đã đến đúng trang web cần tìm! Bảng dưới đây sắp xếp các loại card đồ họa vào các cấp bậc hiệu năng từ cao đến thấp. Các loại card cùng một cấp bậc thì có hiệu năng tương đương nhau.
Để tìm 1 card đồ họa nào đó, nhấn Ctrl+F để dùng tính năng tìm kiếm trên trình duyệt của bạn, sau đó gõ tên card đồ họa mà bạn muốn tìm.
Chú thích: Tên card có màu xanh da trời là card rời dùng cho máy tính để bàn [PC], màu xanh lá là card onboard.
Chú ý: các loại card onboard đời thấp của Intel không được liệt kê ở đây, chẳng hạn như Intel[R] 82945G, Intel[R] G41 Express Chipset... Đây là những loại card rất yếu và chỉ có thể chơi được những game nhẹ.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores33624Core clock speed675 MHz300 MHzBoost clock speedno data1050 MHzNumber of transistorsno data189 millionManufacturing process technologyno data14 nmPower consumption [TDP]no data15 WattTexture fill rateno data25.20
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 460 768MB and HD Graphics 520 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus [motherboard compatibility], additional power connectors [power supply compatibility]. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4Maximum RAM amountno data32 GBMemory bus width192 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speed1800 MHzSystem SharedShared memoryno data+
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX1112 [12_1]Shader Modelno data6.4OpenGLno data4.6OpenCLno data2.1Vulkanno data+
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 104% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GTX 460 768MB 12262
+114%
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 114% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 117% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 160% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 460 768MB 17589
+163%
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 163% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
GTX 460 768MB 133103
+80.7%
GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 81% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p40−45 20 Full HD47 11
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 20777−8 5−6
Full HD Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Battlefield 512−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 20777−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 58−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 414−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Hitman 39−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 28−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Full HD High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Battlefield 512−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 20777−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 58−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 414−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Hitman 39−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 28−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9−10
+125%
4
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Full HD Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Battlefield 512−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 20777−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 58−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 414−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 38−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus2−3 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 23−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
1440p Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20772−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 56−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 46−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt2−3 0−1
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 34−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 22−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1−2 0−1
4K Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla0−1 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 45−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
This is how GTX 460 768MB and HD Graphics 520 compete in popular games:
900p resolution:
- GTX 460 768MB is 100% faster than HD Graphics 520
1080p resolution:
- GTX 460 768MB is 327% faster than HD Graphics 520
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 800% faster than the HD Graphics 520.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 460 768MB surpassed HD Graphics 520 in all 47 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 4.36 2.14 Memory bus width 192 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 336 24
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 520 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop card while HD Graphics 520 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
HD Graphics 520
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate Intel HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.