So sánh gtxx 960 và gtx 1050ti
|
Một loạt điểm benchmark của GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, dòng card đồ hoạ mới của Nvidia dự kiến sẽ giới thiệu vào giữa tháng 10, vừa mới bị lộ ra. Qua đó dòng card mới sẽ có hiệu năng cao hơn GTX 960 mà mức giá lại rẻ hơn. Show
Cụ thể hơn, điểm 3DMark11 của Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ở thiếp lập Extreme là 3867. Để tham khảo, GeForce GTX 950 đạt 2800 còn GTX 960 là 3300. Cũng cần lưu ý là trong khi GTX 1050 Ti là bản tham chiếu, điểm số của GTX 950 và GTX 960 là dựa trên các bản custom đã được ép xung sẵn. Tương tự như vậy, ở thiết lập Performance GTX 1050 Ti đạt 10054 điểm trong khi GTX 950 và GTX 960 lần lượt là 9000 và 10000. CPU trong phép thử của GTX 1050 Ti là Core i7-6700K nên chúng ta cũng có thể loại trừ vấn đề thắt cổ chai bởi CPU. Còn đây là hình chụp thông số của GTX 1050 Ti sử dụng ứng dụng GPU-Z. Bạn có thể thấy rằng chiếc card này là của hãng Colorful. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti dự kiến sẽ chính thức được Nvidia giới thiệu vào giữa tháng 10 này, mức giá vào khoảng 150 USD. Một trong những điểm nhấn của nó chính là mức TDP chỉ 75 W, cho phép hoạt động mà không cần nguồn phụ. Với mức hiệu năng như trên, GTX 1050 Ti hứa hẹn sẽ là một sự lựa chọn sáng giá cho phân khúc card màn hình phổ thông. Một phiên bản khác yếu hơn là GTX 1050 (không có chữ Ti phía sau) cũng được Nvidia dự kiến ra mắt vào cuối tháng 10, giá vào khoảng 120 USD để cạnh tranh trực tiếp với AMD Radeon RX 460. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024CUDA cores7681024Core clock speed1291 MHz1127 MHzBoost clock speed1392 MHz1178 MHzNumber of transistors3,300 million2,940 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °Cno dataTexture fill rate66.8272 billion/secFloating-point performance2,138 gflops2,413 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length145 mm9.5" (24.1 cm)Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)no data400 WattSupplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pinsSLI optionsno data+ MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7008 MHz7.0 GB/sMemory bandwidth112 GB/s112 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Multi monitor supportno data4 displaysHDMI++HDCPno data+Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536G-SYNC support++Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GameStreamno data+GeForce ShadowPlayno data+GPU Boostno data2.0GameWorksno data+VR Ready+no dataAnsel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.4OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.131+CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 4% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 4% in Passmark. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 960 outperforms 1050 Ti by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 960 outperforms 1050 Ti by 6% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 2% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 12% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GTX 1050 Ti 352876 +13.5% 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 14% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 960 outperforms 1050 Ti by 6% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 Ti outperforms 960 by 16% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 326 Mh/s 318 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) 1.01 Gh/s 0.92 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 12.62 Mh/s 8 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.3 kh/s 0.27 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 156.48 Sol/s 141.47 Sol/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD51 65 1440p30 27−30 4K26 29 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207724−27 24−27 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey48 +45.5% 30−35 −45.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla27−30 +3.7% 27−30 −3.7% Battlefield 563 +18.9% 50−55 −18.9% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare40−45 +5% 40−45 −5% Cyberpunk 207724−27 +4% 24−27 −4% Far Cry 540−45 +4.9% 40−45 −4.9% Far Cry New Dawn48 +14.3% 40−45 −14.3% Forza Horizon 469 +27.8% 50−55 −27.8% Hitman 345−50 +4.5% 40−45 −4.5% Horizon Zero Dawn30−35 +3% 30−35 −3% Red Dead Redemption 235 +34.6% 24−27 −34.6% Shadow of the Tomb Raider31 −6.5% 30−35 +6.5% Watch Dogs: Legion30−35 +3.3% 30−33 −3.3% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40 +21.2% 30−35 −21.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla27−30 +3.7% 27−30 −3.7% Battlefield 552 −1.9% 50−55 +1.9% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare39 −2.6% 40−45 +2.6% Cyberpunk 207724−27 +4% 24−27 −4% Far Cry 540−45 +4.9% 40−45 −4.9% Far Cry New Dawn45 +7.1% 40−45 −7.1% Forza Horizon 464 +18.5% 50−55 −18.5% Hitman 345−50 +4.5% 40−45 −4.5% Horizon Zero Dawn30−35 +3% 30−35 −3% Metro Exodus26 +8.3% 24−27 −8.3% Red Dead Redemption 218 −44.4% 24−27 +44.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider27 −22.2% 30−35 +22.2% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt49 −2% 50 +2% Watch Dogs: Legion30−35 +3.3% 30−33 −3.3% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24 −37.5% 30−35 +37.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla27−30 +3.7% 27−30 −3.7% Battlefield 551 −3.9% 50−55 +3.9% Cyberpunk 207724−27 +4% 24−27 −4% Far Cry 536 −13.9% 40−45 +13.9% Far Cry New Dawn41 −2.4% 40−45 +2.4% Forza Horizon 445 −20% 50−55 +20% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt26 −7.7% 28 +7.7% Watch Dogs: Legion30−35 +3.3% 30−33 −3.3% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24 +4.3% 21−24 −4.3% Hitman 324−27 +4% 24−27 −4% Horizon Zero Dawn21−24 +4.8% 21−24 −4.8% Metro Exodus14−16 +0% 14−16 +0% Red Dead Redemption 212−14 +0% 12−14 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24 +5% 20−22 −5% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey16−18 +6.3% 16−18 −6.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +7.7% 12−14 −7.7% Battlefield 536 +9.1% 30−35 −9.1% Cyberpunk 20779−10 +12.5% 8−9 −12.5% Far Cry 527−30 +3.8% 24−27 −3.8% Far Cry New Dawn29 +0% 27−30 +0% Forza Horizon 430−35 +6.7% 30−33 −6.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt16−18 +6.7% 14−16 −6.7% Watch Dogs: Legion10−12 +10% 10−11 −10% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−12 +0% 10−12 +0% Hitman 314−16 +7.1% 14−16 −7.1% Horizon Zero Dawn12−14 +9.1% 10−12 −9.1% Metro Exodus9 +12.5% 8−9 −12.5% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +12.5% 8−9 −12.5% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt16−18 +6.7% 14−16 −6.7% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Assassin's Creed Valhalla8−9 +14.3% 7−8 −14.3% Battlefield 518 +5.9% 16−18 −5.9% Cyberpunk 20773−4 +0% 3−4 +0% Far Cry 512−14 +0% 12−14 +0% Far Cry New Dawn14 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Forza Horizon 420 +0% 20−22 +0% Watch Dogs: Legion7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% This is how GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 960 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 16.23 15.56 Recency 25 October 2016 22 January 2015 Cost $139 $199 Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 1024 Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960. The differences in performance seem too small. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 960 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
